• icon+265(0)111 624 222
  • iconresearch@unima.ac.mw
  • iconChirunga-Zomba, Malawi

Pooled Analysis of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep Among Children From 33 Countries


Author(s) : Kar Hau Chong, Thomas Suesse, Penny L. Cross, Sarah T. Ryan, Eivind Aadland, Oluwayomi Aoko, Ankhmaa Byambaa, Valerie Carson, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Hayley Christian, Dylan P. Cliff, Marieke De Craemer, Clarice Maria de Lucena Martins, Christine Delisle Nyström, Catherine E. Draper, Asmaa El Hamdouchi, Alex Antonio Florindo, Hongyan Guan, Amy S. Ha, Najmeh Hamzavi Zarghani, Kylie D. Hesketh, Mohammad Sorowar Hossain, Jajat Jajat, Thanh Kim, Denise Koh, Anna V. Kontsevaya, Nicholas Kuzik, Marja H. Leppänen, Marie Löf, Himangi Lubree, Kim Meredith-Jones, Tawonga W. Mwase-Vuma, Johan Y. Y. Ng, Rachel Novotny, Jackline Jema Nusurupia, Bang N. Pham, Bee Koon Poh, John J. Reilly, Amanda E. Staiano, Kuston Sultoni, Chiaki Tanaka, Hong K. Tang, Rachael W. Taylor, Simone A. Tomaz, Mark S. Tremblay, Stewart G. Trost, Ali Turab, Susana Vale, V. Pujitha Wickramasinghe, Anthony D. Okely
JAMA Pediatr
21
Citations (scopus)

Abstract


ImportanceThe prevalence estimates of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep (collectively known as movement behaviors) in 3- and 4-year-old children worldwide remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo report the proportion of 3- and 4-year-old children who met the World Health Organization guidelines for physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep across 33 countries.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPooled analysis of data from 14 cross-sectional studies (July 2008 to September 2022) identified through systematic reviews and personal networks. Thirty-three countries of varying income levels across 6 geographical regions. Each study site needed to have at least 40 children aged 3.0 to 4.9 years with valid accelerometry and parent-/caregiver-reported screen time and sleep duration data. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to February 2023.ExposuresTime spent in physical activity was assessed by reanalyzing accelerometry data using a harmonized data-processing protocol. Screen time and sleep duration were proxy reported by parents or caregivers.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe proportion of children who met the World Health Organization guidelines for physical activity (≥180 min/d of total physical activity and ≥60 min/d of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity), screen time (≤1 h/d), and sleep duration (10-13 h/d) was estimated across countries and by World Bank income group and geographical region using meta-analysis.ResultsOf the 7017 children (mean [SD] age, 4.1 [0.5] years; 3585 [51.1%] boys and 3432 [48.9%] girls) in this pooled analysis, 14.3% (95% CI, 9.7-20.7) met the overall guidelines for physical activity, screen time, and sleep duration. There was no clear pattern according to income group: the proportion meeting the guidelines was 16.6% (95% CI, 10.4-25.3) in low- and lower-middle–income countries, 11.9% (95% CI, 5.9-22.5) in upper-middle–income countries, and 14.4% (95% CI, 9.6-21.1) in high-income countries. The region with the highest proportion meeting the guidelines was Africa (23.9%; 95% CI, 11.6-43.0), while the lowest proportion was in North and South America (7.7%; 95% CI, 3.6-15.8).Conclusions and RelevanceMost 3- and 4-year-old children in this pooled analysis did not meet the current World Health Organization guidelines for physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. Priority must be given to understanding factors that influence these behaviors in this age group and to implementing contextually appropriate programs and policies proven to be effective in promoting healthy levels of movement behaviors.


Original language en
Pages (from-to) 1199
Volume 178
Issue number 11
Publication status Published - 2024

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg sdg

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg sdg

    1. Introducing 24-hour movement guidelines for the early years: a new paradigm gaining momentum.. Tremblay (2020). J Phys Act Health, Vol. 17, (1), pp. 92.
      https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2019-0401
    2. Compliance with the 24-h movement guidelines and the relationship with anthropometry in Finnish preschoolers: the DAGIS study.. Leppänen (2019). BMC Public Health, Vol. 19, (1), pp. 1618.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7967-7
    3. Associations between meeting 24-hour movement guidelines and health in the early years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Feng (2021). J Sports Sci, Vol. 39, (22), pp. 2545.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1945183
    4. Relationship between the 24-hour movement guidelines and fundamental motor skills in preschoolers.. Kracht (2020). J Sci Med Sport, Vol. 23, (12), pp. 1185.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.06.021
    5. Prevalence and health associations of meeting the world health organization guidelines for physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in preschool-aged children: the SUNRISE Mongolia Pilot and Feasibility Study.. Byambaa (2024). J Phys Act Health, Vol. 21, (3), pp. 283.
      https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0511
    6. The whole day matters: understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan.. Rollo (2020). J Sport Health Sci, Vol. 9, (6), pp. 493.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004
    7. Prevalence of meeting 24-hour movement guidelines from pre-school to adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries.. Tapia-Serrano (2022). J Sport Health Sci, Vol. 11, (4), pp. 427.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2022.01.005
    8. Future directions for movement behavior research in the early years.. Carson (2023). J Phys Act Health, Vol. 21, (3), pp. 218.
      https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0679
    9. A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children.. Phillips (2021). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, Vol. 18, (1), pp. 141.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9
    10. Standardizing and optimizing the use of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity monitoring.. Esliger (2005). J Phys Act Health, Vol. 2, (3), pp. 366.
      https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2.3.366
    11. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children.. Pate (2006). Obesity (Silver Spring), Vol. 14, (11), pp. 2000.
      https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.234
    12. Prevalence of compliance with a new physical activity guideline for preschool-age children.. Pate (2015). Child Obes, Vol. 11, (4), pp. 415.
      https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2014.0143
    13. Validation of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for the assessment of physical activity in preschool children.. Adolph (2012). J Phys Act Health, Vol. 9, (7), pp. 944.
      https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.9.7.944
    14. Establishing wrist-based cutpoints for the Actical accelerometer in elementary school-aged children.. Schaefer (2014). J Phys Act Health, Vol. 11, (3), pp. 604.
      https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2011-0411
    15. Accelerometer data requirements for reliable estimation of habitual physical activity and sedentary time of children during the early years—a worked example following a stepped approach.. Bingham (2016). J Sports Sci, Vol. 34, (20), pp. 2005.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1149605
    16. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.. Balduzzi (2019). Evid Based Ment Health, Vol. 22, (4), pp. 153.
      https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
    17. Inequality in physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep duration and risk of obesity in children: a 12-country study.. Chaput (2018). Obes Sci Pract, Vol. 4, (3), pp. 229.
      https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.271
    18. Systematic review of the correlates of outdoor play and time among children aged 3-12?years.. Lee (2021). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, Vol. 18, (1), pp. 41.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01097-9
    19. Screen time in the coronavirus 2019 era: international trends of increasing use among 3- to 7-year-old children.. Ribner (2021). J Pediatr, Vol. 239, pp. 59.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.08.068
    20. Exploring the perception of parents on children’s screentime: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.. Chong (2023). Pediatr Res, Vol. 94, (3), pp. 915.
      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02555-9
    21. Associations of screen time, sedentary time and physical activity with sleep in under 5s: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Janssen (2020). Sleep Med Rev, Vol. 49.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101226
    22. Comparison between actigraphy records and parental reports of child’s sleep.. Perpétuo (2020). Front Pediatr, Vol. 8.
      https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.567390
    23. Physical activity and outdoor play of children in public playgrounds-do gender and social environment matter?. Reimers (2018). Int J Environ Res Public Health, Vol. 15, (7), pp. 1356.
      https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071356
    24. Do the correlates of screen time and sedentary time differ in preschool children?. Downing (2017). BMC Public Health, Vol. 17, (1), pp. 285.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4195-x
    25. The relationships between sex, age, geography and time in bed in adolescents: a meta-analysis of data from 23 countries.. Olds (2010). Sleep Med Rev, Vol. 14, (6), pp. 371.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2009.12.002
    26. Correlates of sleep duration in early childhood: a systematic review.. Zhang (2021). Behav Sleep Med, Vol. 19, (3), pp. 407.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2020.1772264
    27. Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old).. Lettink (2022). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, Vol. 19, (1), pp. 116.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01296-y
    28. Population-level physical activity surveillance in young people: are accelerometer-based measures ready for prime time?. Trost (2020). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, Vol. 17, (1), pp. 28.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00929-4
    29. A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0-5 years).. Arts (2022). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, Vol. 19, (1), pp. 18.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01251-x
    30. Hox (2017). .
      https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982
    31. . .
      World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550536
    32. . .
      The World Bank. World Bank country and lending groups—country classification. Accessed February 21, 2022. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519
    33. . .
      United Nations. World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. Accessed November 12, 2023. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
    34. . .
      Statistics Canada. Urban greenness, 2001, 2011 and 2019. Accessed November 12, 2023. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/16-002-x/2021001/article/00002-eng.htm
    35. . .
      World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world. Accessed November 10, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514187
    36. . .
      UNICEF. Bridging the gender digital divide: challenges and an urgent call for action for equitable digital skills development. Accessed November 29, 2023. https://data.unicef.org/resources/ictgenderdivide/

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg sdg