• icon+265(0)111 624 222
  • iconresearch@unima.ac.mw
  • iconChirunga-Zomba, Malawi

Measuring vulnerability to assess households resilience to flood risks in Karonga district, Malawi


Author(s) : Isaac Kadono Mwalwimba, Mtafu Manda, Cosmo Ngongondo
Nat Hazards
5
Citations (scopus)

Abstract


Abstract Many parts of Malawi are prone to natural hazards with varying degrees of risk and vulnerability. This study aimed at obtaining baseline data for quantifying vulnerability of the households to flood risks in Karonga District in northern Malawi, specifically in Group Village Headman Matani Mwakasangila of Traditional Authority Kilupula. The study used cross-sectional survey, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire. This study applied Flood Vulnerability Index and statistical methods to quantify and analyse vulnerability of households in the aspects of exposure, susceptibility and resilience characteristics. Proportional Odds Model also known as Ordered Logistic Regression was used to identify factors that determine vulnerability of households to flood risks. The results show that households headed by females and elders of age (at least 61 years) were the most vulnerable to floods because of their limited social and livelihood capacities, resulting from being uneconomically active group. Households with houses built of mud, thatched and very old with no protective account for high vulnerability due to the fact that most of them are constructed using substandard materials. The level of vulnerability was increasing with an increase in the number of households exposed and susceptible to floods. With an increase in resilience to floods, vulnerability level was decreasing. The results further revealed a predictive margins of vulnerability levels which were not significantly different among the villages. However, villages with more exposed, susceptible and not resilience households were most vulnerable to floods. This study recommends that vulnerability assessment should be included in Disaster Risk Reduction planning and implementation in order to make DRR more efficient and realistic. This would further strengthen the disaster risk management to be more proactive as well as increase resilience of households to flood risks.


Original language en
Pages (from-to) 6609-6628
Volume 120
Issue number 7
Publication status Published - 2024

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg

Access document

10.1007/s11069-024-06416-4

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg

Access document

10.1007/s11069-024-06416-4
    1. . .
      https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-370-139-2015
    2. SF Balica (2012). Nat Hazards, Vol. 64, (1), pp. 73.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0234-1
    3. . .
      Barret S, Steinbach D, Addison S (2021) Assessing Vulnerability to disasters displacement: a good practice review (November 2021). Working paper. UNDRR
    4. J Birkmann (2006). .
      Birkmann J, Winner B (2006) Measuring the un-measurable: the challenge of vulnerability. UNU-IEH, Bonn
    5. J Birkmann (2006). pp. 329.
      Birkmann J, Fernando N, Hettige (2006) Measuring vulnerability in Sri Lanka at the local level. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University, Tokyo, pp 329–356
    6. . .
      DoDMA (2014) National disaster risk management communication strategy (2014–2018). Lilongwe, Malawi: department of disaster management affairs
    7. . .
      DoPDMA (2014) Department of poverty and disaster management affairs. Lilongwe, Malawi: department of disaster management affairs
    8. . .
      FEMA (2018) Emergency management in Malawi: A work in progress with a strong foundation. Florida: Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security
    9. . .
      Fisher A, Laing J, Stoeckel J (2010) Handbook for family planning operation research design. Population Council
    10. T Kamanga (2020). Geographia Technica, Vol. 15, (1), pp. 132.
      https://doi.org/10.21163/GT_2020.151.12
    11. . .
      Karonga District Socio-Economic Profile (2013) Karonga District. Malawi
    12. RB Munyai (2019). J Disaster Risk Stud, Vol. 11, (2), pp. a692.
      https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i2.692
    13. . .
      https://doi.org/10.21275/SR20411180826
    14. . .
      Nabegu (2018) Analysis of Vulnerability to Flood Disaster in Kano State, Nigeria (Environmental Science, Geography)
    15. H Nasiri (2016). Sustain Water Resour Manag, Vol. 2, (3), pp. 331.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-016-0051-x
    16. M Nazeer (2019). Pak Sustain, Vol. 11, (23), pp. 6695.
      https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236695
    17. M Nazeer (2020). Nat Hazards, Vol. 105, pp. 755.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04336-7
    18. . .
      UNDP-Malawi (T. Msowoya: personal email on February 3, 2009)
    19. . .
      UNDP- Malawi (2016. Malawi: Ranking—HDI—Human Development

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg

Access document

10.1007/s11069-024-06416-4