• icon+265(0)111 624 222
  • iconresearch@unima.ac.mw
  • iconChirunga-Zomba, Malawi

Are you a UNIMA researcher? Login

An African Social Constructivism of Technology


Author(s) : Yamikani Ndasauka
African Mind, Culture, and Technology

Abstract


This chapter develops social constructivist perspectives as conceptual lenses to examine and cement African technology. In contrast to technological determinism, constructivism recognises technologies as socially shaped artefacts embedded within cultural contexts. The analysis traces constructivism’s intellectual foundations through history, philosophy, and science and technology studies. Thinkers like Mumford, Ellul, Marx, and Dewey surfaced technology’s cultural embeddedness. Feminist and postcolonial scholars revealed biases in dominant paradigms. Constructivism critiques problematic assumptions of technical rationalism, including technologies following scientific logic alone, being value-neutral, impacting societies unilaterally, and assuming universal applicability. The chapter argues that technologies in Africa should be socio-culturally shaped, exhibiting interpretive flexibility. Their design and integration trajectories should reflect empowered groups’ contested goals and assumptions. Thus, marginalised populations can help reshape technological pathways through localisation and participatory co-construction. The chapter further argues that technology should focus on highlighting interests and problematising neutrality guided by cultural philosophies. The goal of this framework is to establish foundations for situated, humanistic African innovation, recognising technology as a site of cultural meaning-making to be participatory steered, not just transferring technical solutions. This framework will see technologies guided by African epistemologies and plural participation to advance human development.


Original language en
Pages (from-to) 105-128
Publication status Published - 2024

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg

Access document

10.1007/978-3-031-62979-2_6

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg

Access document

10.1007/978-3-031-62979-2_6
    1. . .
      https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893
    2. RA Austen (1983). African Studies Review, Vol. 26, (3/4), pp. 163.
      https://doi.org/10.2307/524168
    3. AB Babalola (2017). Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 48, (5), pp. 501.
      https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934717701915
    4. R Bick (2018). Environmental Health, Vol. 17, pp. 92.
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7
    5. W Bijker (1995). pp. 229.
      Bijker, W. (1995). Sociohistorical technology studies. In S. Hasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 229–256). Sage.
    6. WE Bijker (1987). pp. 1.
      Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987). General introduction. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology of history and technology (pp. 1–6). MIT Press.
    7. WE Bijker (1992). pp. 17.
      Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Do technologies have trajectories? In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in socio-technical change (pp. 17–20). MIT Press.
    8. . .
      Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society, vintage books (J. Wilkinson Trans.). Random House.
    9. AM Fairchild (2007). International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 3, pp. 612.
      https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016836
    10. A Feenberg (1991). .
      Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press.
    11. . .
      https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2016.0235
    12. K Gyekye (1997). .
      https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112252.001.0001
    13. LA Hickman (1992). .
      Hickman, L. A. (1992). John Dewey’s pragmatic technology. Indiana University Press.
    14. TP Hughes (1987). pp. 51.
      Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker & T. P. Hughes (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 51–82). MIT Press.
    15. K Kinyanjui (1993). Asian Perspective, Vol. 17, (2), pp. 269.
      https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.1993.a921225
    16. J Law (1987). pp. 111.
      Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111–134). MIT Press.
    17. (1985). .
      MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1985). The social shaping of technology. Open University Press.
    18. JS Mbiti (1969). .
      Mbiti, J. S. (1969). African religions and philosophy. Heinemann.
    19. D Mcquarie (1978). Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 59, (1), pp. 3.
      Mcquarie, D., & Amburgey, T. (1978). Marx and modern systems theory. Social Science Quarterly, 59(1), 3–19. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42859863
    20. . .
      https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668319862137
    21. VY Mudimbe (1988). .
      Mudimbe, V. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy, and the order of knowledge. James Currey.
    22. L Mumford (1934). .
      Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. Routledge.
    23. (2009). .
      Murove, M. F. (Ed.). (2009). African ethics: An anthology for comparative and applied ethics. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
    24. Y Ndasauka (2021). .
      Ndasauka, Y. (2021). Dynamic view of technology: Implications on ethics of social networking sites. In G. Kayange & C. Verharen (Eds.), Ethics in Malawi. RVP.
    25. . .
      https://doi.org/10.1177/00219347231157739
    26. BE Oladumiye (2014). International Journal of Art, Culture, Design, and Technology (IJACDT), Vol. 4, (2), pp. 51.
      https://doi.org/10.4018/IJACDT.201407010
    27. JR Pannabecker (1991). Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 3, (1), pp. 1.
      https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v3i1.a.4
    28. LM Pesando (2020). .
      https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70060-1_140-1
    29. . .
      https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
    30. . .
      https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3116
    31. Y Rodny-Gumede (2017). Communications, Vol. 43, (2), pp. 10.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2017.1318938
    32. KW Willoughby (1990). .
      Willoughby, K. W. (1990). Technology choice: A critique of the appropriate technology movement. Westview Press.
    33. L Winner (1980). Daedalus, Vol. 109, pp. 1.
      Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109, 1.
    34. K Wiredu (2008). South African Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 27, (4), pp. 332.
      https://doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v27i4.31522

UN SDGs

This research output contributes to the following United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

sdg

Access document

10.1007/978-3-031-62979-2_6