Are you a UNIMA researcher? Login
| Funder | University of Malawi |
|---|---|
| Funding Type | Research Grant |
| Amount | MK 15–40 million |
| Publication Date | 10 April 2026 |
| Scheme open Date | 30 April 2026 |
| Duration | 12–24 months |
| Deadline | 30 June 2026, 11:00 PM CAT |
The University of Malawi is inviting proposals for the next round of its Internal Interdisciplinary Research programme. The Programme supports collaborative projects across UNIMA’s schools, encouraging innovative research that contributes to academic excellence, policy impact, and industry collaboration.
This programme supports high-quality, interdisciplinary research projects and associated publications to enhance UNIMA's research culture and encourage collaboration. Proposals must demonstrate interdisciplinary collaboration across schools and departments and contribute to the national development agenda.
This initiative complements UNIMA's strategic objectives by promoting excellence in research, fostering cross-disciplinary partnerships, and enhancing research capacity among academic staff. It is open to groups of current academic staff at UNIMA who meet the eligibility criteria. Read the complete eligibility requirements below.
| Attachment | Notes |
|---|---|
| Case for Support (max. 5,000 words) | Separate attachment |
| Justification of Resources (max. 2 sides of A4) | Free flowing |
| Detailed Budget (Excel) | Use provided budget template |
| Results Framework & Implementation Plan (Excel) | Use provided template |
| Data Management Plan (max. 2 sides of A4) | See Appendix 1 of guidelines |
| Signed Letter of Commitment | Single letter, all signatures |
| References | Only references cited in proposal |
| Letters of Support from Partner Organisations | If applicable |
| Criterion | Weight | What reviewers will consider |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific merit and innovation | 20% | Originality and significance of the research questions; novelty of the approach; quality of the literature review; contribution to new ideas across disciplinary boundaries. |
| Conceptual clarity | 20% | Clarity and coherence of the objectives; strength of the theoretical or conceptual framework; rigour and appropriateness of the chosen methodology and analysis framework. |
| Team capability and capacity building | 15% | Quality of the interdisciplinary team; qualifications and track record relative to career stage; quality of mentorship plans for junior researchers; evidence of effective collaboration across departments or schools. |
| Potential for impact and knowledge translation | 10% | Significance of the research problem for Malawi; plausibility of pathways from research to academic, policy, or societal impact; alignment with MW2063 and the National Research Agenda. |
| Dissemination strategy | 10% | Quality and realism of the planned outputs (publications, datasets, policy briefs, events, etc.); appropriateness of dissemination channels for the intended audiences; open access plans. |
| Feasibility | 5% | Realism of the work plan and timeline; adequacy of the Results Framework; identification and mitigation of risks; clarity of roles and responsibilities. |
| Gender and inclusion | 10% | Gender balance in team composition; integration of gender dimensions into research design; inclusion of diverse and marginalised groups; use of an intersectional approach. |
| Budget justification and value for money | 10% | Appropriateness of costs relative to proposed outputs; balance between activities and resources; quality of justification. Reviewers recognise that certain research methods are inherently more costly and will not penalise proposals solely on cost grounds. |